šØ Breaking News: āOops, AI Did It Againā Stephen A Smith & PBD Get Tricked By Fake Jemele Hill Clickbait š³
- Voices Heard

- Jun 8
- 1 min read

Sometimes the internet is like that friend who almost remembers your birthdayābut then wishes you happy anniversary instead. In early JuneāÆ2025, we saw a textbook case of getting burned by trusting flashy AI and celebrity pundits too much.
The Setup: Chatbots and quickāscanners circulated a shocking claim: Jemele Hill allegedly made a controversial commentāonly to have both Google AI results and hotātake voices like StephenāÆA. Smith and PatrickāÆBetāDavid repeat it. Cue outrage, tweets, and video clips⦠all to discover there was no record of her saying it.
Enter reality: Missed citations? No reputable media outlet picked it up. No clip exists. The claim evaporated as fast as a summer cloud. But the damage was doneāand donāt even mention the AI output explaining it confidently.
This isnāt just a āwhoopsā moment. Itās a real sign of the times:
AI hallucinations: Machines guess and sound convincing ā but accuracy is optional.
Celebrity amplification: StephenāÆA. and PBD are influencersāwhen they speak, it echoes.
Distorted virality: False claims spread wide and fast, even after corrections show up.
ā ļø The takeaway? Trust but verify. Whether itās Jemele Hill or Elon Musk or whatever Gem-based celebrity tweet is trending, treat it like a memeādonāt hit the āretweetā button without proof. Even algorithms and famous voices can blow smoke.
Research has flagged that misinfo isnāt just annoyingāit can entrench mistrust in the media itself, especially when AI gets overtrusted or influencers say something unverified .
So next time some bot or pundit says, āJemele Hill said Xāhave you heard?ā, channel your inner lateānight factāchecker.




Comments